看更多編輯精選文章

吳學儒/從「手榴彈事件」出發:漢人社工如何在原民部落學習、進退、培養文化敏銳度?

張雅晴/走進國際性別現場:從紐約 NGO CSW 論壇,看不同國界的性別平權挑戰

東亞與歐洲照顧年會:打造社區照顧生活圈、正視長照成本上升與人力不足、保障移工

6個提問認識「微笑憂鬱症」:和憂鬱症有什麼不同?看起來很快樂,但內心很憂鬱?/《微笑憂鬱》

「以兒少為中心」的兒童節目如何製作?孩子的各種樣貌與悲喜,都值得被看見!

臺灣應通過一部專為 NPM 設計的組織法,以法律明訂 NPM 的職責權限、組成方式(組織架構)。
It is clear that establishing an NPM is much more than just giving the current Control Yuan a new title.
It is necessary to distinguish the situations when a medicine is used as “treatment” or as “restraint”.
NPM has the responsibility to advocate against the stigma on people with mental disabilities.
We should also remember that the NPM is not the only measure prescribed by the Convention against Torture to prevent torture.
How should we determine the nature of those treatments and determine whether they reach the level of ill-treatment?
It’s the NPM’s responsibility to continue monitoring and pressure for reform whenever there is a chance.
Would the degrading treatment of migrants in the unknown facility hidden in the woods be revealed to the world if there was no NPM?
The better the preparations are done, the more likely that the monitors can reveal the signs of torture and ill treatment.