看更多編輯精選文章

沉睡的失智資金:南韓失智長者資產達 154 兆,詐騙風險高、破壞經濟循環

小美/「狠心的媽媽」背後:我留不住你不是不愛你,是想給你更好的生活

【專題|障礙女性的婚育路】從「完美的母親」解放,摸索多元家庭的樣貌

【專題|聽我們的故事】原住民轉型正義:政治受難歷史與創傷療癒

逆轉平等進程,紐西蘭倉促修改《同工同酬法》,低薪照顧工作、公共服務首當其衝

It is necessary to distinguish the situations when a medicine is used as “treatment” or as “restraint”.
使用精神藥物到底是為了「治療」,還是只是「約束」?此時,病患的同意正是判斷關鍵。
NPM has the responsibility to advocate against the stigma on people with mental disabilities.
除了經常對精神機構展開突襲性訪視,NPM 也有責任為消除精神障礙者的汙名盡一份倡議努力。
We should also remember that the NPM is not the only measure prescribed by the Convention against Torture to prevent torture.
How should we determine the nature of those treatments and determine whether they reach the level of ill-treatment?
NPM 應從個別病患的治療計畫目的,來評估他或她受到的對待是否合理正當。
It’s the NPM’s responsibility to continue monitoring and pressure for reform whenever there is a chance.
Would the degrading treatment of migrants in the unknown facility hidden in the woods be revealed to the world if there was no NPM?